As You Like It

Standard

Shakespeare At the Tobacco Factory

13th June

Exeter Northcott

 

A review by Grace Natusch 

Since I am currently tackling the epic tragedy that is King Lear in the classroom, which is heavy to say the least, seeing one of Shakespeare’s funniest comedies outside the classroom proved a refreshing change. The cast tell the story of the exile of Rosalind and Orlando with impeccable comic timing that had me roaring with laughter, genuinely feel-good moments and even some audience participation (A special mention has to go to the lady in the front row who nearly fell out of her chair trying to remove the fool’s socks).

What was fairly impressive about this production (and what I have found with Tobacco Factory productions in the past) is that they manage to make Shakespearian dialogue incredibly accessible through their acting, meaning the story is gripping and easy to follow (something which is sadly not the case with all Shakespeare productions). Because of this, it was easy to feel as if you had stepped into the Forest of Arden and were watching Orlando’s wrestling match and Rosalind’s cross-dressing antics as if you were actually there.

As well as this the production made wonderful use of music and singing to help scenes transition smoothly from one to another, with guitars, accordions and other musical instruments making their appearance onstage. All in all, the Tobacco Factory does a brilliant job of what is probably my new favourite Shakespeare comedy (narrowly overtaking Twelfth Night) and is well worth watching if you are looking for something a little lighter than Lear.

EDge

Standard

Exeter Phoenix

27th May 2014

 

A review by Phoebe Graham

As Postgraduates from the London Contemporary Dance School, EDge gave an exemplary technical show, flourishing all they had learned into four individual contrasting sections of choreography to construct the showcase.

Personally, I find the critiquing of dance instead of theatre quite a tricky step to make. Within the finely tuned physique of a dancer there exists a continuum between technicality and performance. As a self-confessed theatre lover myself, I naturally viewed the contemporary showcase (a new personal experience) from a much more theatrical perspective. I sought commitment towards characterisation and even expected notions of storytelling. A solid technical aptitude is essential in the execution of a good dancer, but to be a great dancer requires the ability to move an audience and evoke emotion.

Even when confronted with 14 minutes of (rather tiresome) rhythmic walking, I was drawn to watch some dancers more than others, those who shared expression and animation with their audience.

The first piece, ‘The Living Room’, displayed a clever motif development exemplified by the creation of the furniture of the room, but it is a concept that has been done and stamped on with the probably delicate feet of many a dancer. Although effective, it was stylistically predictable. The accompanying repetitive exchanges of ‘don’t mention it’ gave a vocal life to the performance but I felt that this made it a lot more rigid than it could have been without the unnecessary natter.

The following segment, ‘Subject to Change’ was rather far-fetched and I was left questioning the artistic intention behind it. A celebration of rhythm, perhaps, as the use of a metronome underscored the piece and produced a very effective and simple backbone. I would have liked to have seen more expressive communication from the dancers to compensate for the simple concept, enhancing the performance to a fuller creative spectacle.

‘Spring on Mars’ shot the performance into space! The section comprised of outstanding character and was the much needed comic relief after the preceding sequence; Ellyn Hebron was a brilliant example of a performer who held the perfect balance between technical accuracy and theatrical portrayal. She managed to craft her art into creative sophistication, using both her body and her face to convey a sense of character, beauty but also comedy.

The idea behind the final number, ‘a power to bring light into a darkened room’ was directed as if each dancer was a light-particle desperate for the limited light. The strong concept was supported by stunning choreography and allowed the company to highlight the true contemporary technique of every dancer.

Having pondered over the difference between technical talent and performance presence, a question still remains unanswered. Is it possible to learn this performer presence? I would like to think the improvement of technical ability comes with a dedication to practice and is something that can be taught. However, I would argue that having the talent to be able to lift a performance and give it an extra spark is something that has to be derived from an inherent natural quality; perhaps it comes from the experience in understanding the needs of an audience, who are realistically at the heart of any performance. In the meantime Edge contemporary, keeeeeep dancing!

Ignite 2014 – Young Critics Recommend

Standard

The Exeter Northcott Young Critics are busy this week for Ignite, Exeter’s brilliant festival of Theatre now in it’s 5th year.  Supported by Belinda Dillion the young critics are on assignment for Wildfire, the daily review paper.  It’s going to be a great challenge to watch, write and submit their reviews all within a few hours.  Grace Natusch is particularly excited by the opportunity as it will mean her review will be published alongside professional critics for the first time.  We met last week to discuss the programme, and Carmen and Grace would like to share a few recommendations and shows that have grabbed their attention, should you still be umming and arring about what to see.

Carmen Paddock

While the Ignite Festival has no shortage of fantastic theatrical performances of all forms and styles, I would have to highlight the RAW Platform as an exceptionally unique, diverse, and exciting offering.  Produced by Exeter University’s Drama Department in conjunction with the Exeter Northcott Theatre, it showcases the original work of graduating BA and MFA students in a rotating performance schedule over three days.  This year includes commedia dell’arte, dance theatre, verbatim, Shakespeare re-imaginings, comedy, and more.

Another especially exciting piece during this Ignite Festival is Poetry Ping-Pong, showing at the Exeter Phoenix.  Billed as ‘an evening of comedy and spoken word’, it is set far in the future, when poetry is turned into a blood sport and now only two contestants remain in this deadly game.  The premise and early reviews promise an insanely entertaining show!

Grace Natusch

Love Sick – A play by the All in theatre, I was drawn to this play by the rather grabbing blurb, which told me that it was about love, aliens and their dying planet. This play looks like a comedic look at how we view love and I’m looking forward to seeing what the alien ambassadors have to say on the subject.

A stand up show from Alfie Brown, Divorced from reality (and my wife), has an attention grabbing name and is described as ‘another screaming, pretentious, crusading monstrosity’.  It will be interesting to see how this show handles divorce and mental illness and manages to remain hilarious all at the same time.

Keep an eye out for Wildfire around Exeter and on the blog, the first paper is published today!

Whats next? Reviews on their way from last weeks dance performance by EDge at Exeter Phoenix and community play Jerusalem in Rougemont Gardens.

 

 

 

Birdsong – Young Critics Discuss

Standard

Birdsong

Exeter Northcott 

8th May 2014

A review conversation by Young Critics Carmen Paddock and Freddie House

On the centenary of the outbreak of World War I, the Original Theatre Company and Birdsong Productions Ltd. have launched a national tour of Birdsong, an adaptation of Sebastian Faulks’s celebrated novel set in France before, during, and after the Great War. It is a moving exploration of the devastations of war, and to convey its brutality yet also its poignancy within the small space of any theatre is not a simple task. Rachel Wagstaff’s bold decision to transfer Birdsong to the stage is here seen through the eyes of two reviewers with varying background knowledge and subsequent expectations.

Carmen PaddockCarmen

As someone who had never read the original material, I cannot comment on the way the story has been adapted for the stage. However as a piece of theatre it was riveting, capturing the audience’s undivided attention for a two-and-half-hour run time which flew by.

The aura of war permeated the auditorium well before the actual performance. The curtain was raised, revealing a set dominated by rubble, barbed wire, and barricades, and about five minutes before the scheduled start time a low, intermittent drum started to play. This martial music got slowly louder and louder, reaching full show volume as the play began. It was incredible how this military atmosphere pervaded the space before the auditorium lights had even dimmed, heightening immersive experience (and at certain points, its abject terror). Another very effective element of the production was its excellent use of live music throughout. Transitions were often accompanied by live violin music, and several scenes incorporated humming and choral or solo singing. These were intelligently inserted at key plot moments to underscore the characters’ experiences and emotions.

The plot combines two storylines in a series of wartime chronological events and pre-war flashbacks, and the transitions are indicated by abstract physical movements and set changes. It follows Stephen Wraysford, a young Englishman who is seen both during his time with a French factory owner in 1910 and then as a lieutenant leading his men through France, ultimately to the Battle of the Somme. Memories of the former time pervade Stephen’s horrific present existence, especially his passionate affair with the beautiful Isabelle Astaire, the factory owner’s strong yet unhappy wife. Sometimes these transitions were difficult to follow, but that could have been due to an unfamiliarity with the novel.

Birdsong was incredibly well-acted; all roles from the leads to the supporting characters were fleshed out and individual. Special mention must go to Carolin Stoltz; she gave a nuanced, convincing, heartfelt performance, encapsulating both Isabelle’s resilience and tenderness. If there was a weak link, however, it would have been George Banks as Stephen. Playing such a volatile character with extremes of gentleness and brutality is no small feat, but these passions sometimes seemed unrelatable, thus distancing him from the audience. Perhaps with hundreds of pages to explain his character in the novel, he comes off as more sympathetic there.

Even amongst the production’s atmospheric and performance strengths, the technical effects were possibly its strongest elements. The creative team unafraid to go for extremes – hard blackouts, loud shots and shell explosions, and a massive set (described above). These certainly served the piece’s visceral violence and gave the impression that even the audience was not safe from the bullets, tunnel collapses, and mindless slaughter. Birdsong, while not perfect, was a memorable night of theatre for its well-executed direction and design, its mostly powerful performances, and its poignant story.

Freddie HouseFreddie

This centennial production pays off in my opinion, with this adaptation successfully conveying the extreme desolation and terror of living in wartime. Having studied the novel Birdsong at school, I was interested to see the ways in which the Original Theatre Company would translate such a renowned piece of literature onto the stage, and the result was striking to say the least.

Faulks opens the novel in peacetime, prior to the outbreak of war, depicting Amiens as a tranquil and pastoral environment. The stage adaptation, however, opens in wartime, and introduces the audience to Jack Firebrace, a tunneller, played with the convincing contrast between his self-assurance and vulnerability by former Blue Peter presenter Peter Duncan. Jack is surrounded by his colleagues, who include Jonny Clarke as the naïve and juvenile Tipper, whilst Samuel Martin strikes a chord of affection with his light-hearted yet compelling portrayal of Evans.

Birdsong’s protagonist, Stephen Wraysford, portrayed by George Banks, is introduced to the audience as a cold and dethatched persona in wartime. The production then shifts back in time setting between wartime and pre-war throughout the two acts, slowly unveiling the cause of Stephen’s pain as his long-lost lover, Isabelle, who was seductively yet innocently depicted by Carolin Stoltz. Whilst this is a refreshing and somewhat innovative take on the structure of the novel, it made Banks’ job of conveying the two aspects of Stephen’s character, with his passion before the war and his detachment during, much more challenging. I felt the demands of switching between the time settings made it difficult for him to demonstrate honestly the impact both love and war have had on his character over time, often giving the sense that Banks explored only the cold aspects of Stephen’s character in order to make the audience’s, and indeed his, evening a little easier. The change in structure, I felt, was a bold risk, and in terms of the audience’s viewpoint was very effective, but unfortunately led to be a major flaw in the production as a whole due to the unconvincing presentation of the play’s vital lead role.

Don’t, however, let this deter you from what was otherwise a great night at the theatre. The subtle and powerful undertones of the violin conveyed the strong sense of the fragility of the soldiers that takes pages of Faulks’ descriptive language to capture, whilst the powerful and striking drum beats transported the audience directly to life on the front line. The intense bursts of light signalling explosions, followed by a sudden blackout, made even the back row squint, making the entire audience feel involved in the unfolding of events. The set also managed to perform its challenging role of switching settings very effectively, with practical props signalling to the audience the exact time and place of the current scene.

If you are a fan of the novel, I would advise that you book tickets immediately to see this raw and honest adaptation of Birdsong. If you are not a fan of the novel, or like Carmen you have not read it, you are not at a disadvantage. If I had to say just one thing, it would be that the stage production does not worry about straying too far from the text, and most definitely establishes itself as a stand-alone piece of theatre. Most of the time this is effective, and for that I commend it.

Birdsong – Review

Standard

Birdsong

Exeter Northcott

9th May 2014

A review by Phoebe Graham

Based on the acclaimed novel by Sebastian Faulks, Birdsong presents the experiences and psychological effects of fighting on the Western Front during World War One. Amidst the chaos leading up to the Battle of the Somme, an English Officer reminisces of a time of lost love, transporting the audience on a journey through his life before and during the War, whilst questioning himself and his reasons for fighting.

Life on the front line is a hard concept to manage, especially on stage, but the Original Theatre Company faced this challenge with a stunning visual representation and technical recreation of the Wartime experience. The authentic set, designed by Victoria Spearing, consisted of a scenic backdrop of barbed wire and broken wood to represent the front line trenches as well as a movable tunnel and a balcony for the more domestic scenes. This combination of settings within the set allowed for seamless transitions, which were enhanced by the actors who brought on the props and necessary pieces to bring the action to life.

The surprisingly realistic sound effects used to realise trench warfare created a tangible insight into the intensity of life on the front line. Alex Wardle’s lighting, which made strong use of shadows and minimal light in order to plunge the audience into the darkness felt by those who had to endure the tunnels and the general back light which subtly changed depending on the time of day and setting, both contributed to an exceptional technical show. These aspects of the performance were what really gave Birdsong its edge, emphasising the sensory experience of wartime France.

The emotion of the show was undoubtedly lifted by the original music executed expressively by actor-musician Samuel Martin. The music allowed for the performance to flow through the different time periods of the show, sewing together pieces of the story as smoothly as the stroke of the violin bow as well as heightening melancholy moments. This was exemplified in my favourite scene of the show where the men of the trenches and the tunnels all read out their letters to their loved ones, accompanied by a single singer in a heart-wrenching rendition of traditional welsh song Calon Lan.

A strong ensemble supported the play, many actors playing several characters with great conviction. The heart of the play was attributed to the men who were in the tunnels where all actors pulled off both an entertaining and moving performance. These sections were led by the fantastic Peter Duncan who stood out as the most convincing actor of the play in a very complex role, despite his Blue Peter beginnings. If anything, I would have quite liked to see more of this side to the play, as I wasn’t entirely enthused by the other love driven storyline.

Despite a dedicated performance, I found the lover leads of Stephen Wraysford (George Banks) and Izabelle Azaire (Carolin Stoltz) quite tiresome to watch. Banks was set on excessively throwing himself around the stage in an over-exaggerated fashion for the majority of the play and if not was awkwardly hanging off other characters for the rest, shouting inaudible clamors. Stoltz‘s character also remained rather stagnant throughout, with the exception of a rather raunchy, gracelessly half choreographed romance scene, where I finally saw a short-lived complexity evolve in her character. The main issue with both of their performances was the complete lack of charisma. They managed to disconnect themselves from my sentiments in such a way that I was left in the interval simply not caring about the further development of their story.

Regardless of this laboured narrative, I commend The Original Theatre Company for staging Birdsong with such beauty and sensitivity. I write this with the palpable scent of gun powder and smoke still tickling my senses along with the wonderfully unforgettable silhouettes of the front line soldiers. This frozen action of the men climbing the trenches will be the closest I will get to being able to comprehend the atrocities of the First World War. This is what makes Birdsong a necessary piece of theatre.

H.M.S. Pinafore – Review

Standard

H.M.S. Pinafore

by W.S Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan 

Exeter Northcott 

Saturday 5th April 2014

Review by Saxon Mudge

Sometimes, when you least expect it, a show comes along and sweeps you off your feet, reminding you of what it is about theatre that makes it so special. Undoubtedly, Sasha Regan’s all-male H.M.S. Pinafore is one of these shows. The production is slick, saucy and genuinely charming – I loved every second of it! Presenting Gilbert and Sullivan to the modern audience can be a challenge, but Regan does it with ease, making each joke fresh and original without losing the show’s classic appeal.

Set on a World War Two battleship, the show presents the ins and outs of life aboard the Pinafore, and tells the hilarious tale of love between classes. The production is full to the brim of impressive vocals, witty jokes and some of the most inventive choreography I have seen on stage; all of which make up for the opera’s farcical plot and somewhat bewildering ending.

What is really striking is the simplicity of the production. The sailors’ staple costumes consist of a vest, shorts and a beanie hat; a single keyboard accompanies the many musical numbers; the set is stripped back to a few bunk beds, some boxes and a rope. However, it is not what the set looks like, but how it is used that makes it interesting. The multifunctional props really add to the overall humour of the show, with the use of rope during “Things are seldom what they seem” being especially effective. This enhancement in turn brings more focus to the cast, whose charisma, harmonies and subtle sight-gags fill the theatre more than any elaborate set design could.

The ensemble is hilarious, and works together in a way that presents the crew as a united group of people with individual personalities, something which is surprisingly challenging to convincingly capture on stage. It is easy to forget that it is an all-male cast, as the male sopranos are utterly spell-binding; a notable performance being Alan Richardson’s ‘Josephine’ whose angelic vocals in “Sorry her lot who loves too well” are a highlight of the show. Keith Jack charms the audience as the lovelorn ‘Ralph’, Alex Weatherhill’s rosy and endearing ‘Buttercup’ leaves no face without a grin and David McKechnie is superb in his role as the arrogant and obsequious ‘Sir Joseph Porter K.C.B’. However, the standout performances of the show come from Neil Moors, whose power-house voice and energetic presence make for a brilliant ‘Captain Cocoran’ and the hilarious Richard Russell Edwards as the loveable yet neglected ‘Cousin Hebe’.

I must confess that this is the first Gilbert and Sullivan I have ever seen, and that I had never even heard of the Savoy Operas before watching the show, but if they’re all as fun and sincere as Sasha Regan’s inventive production then I cannot wait for a Gilbert and Sullivan filled future.

The all-male H.M.S. Pinafore is touring the UK until May 10th, so I urge anyone who hasn’t seen it to step forward, buy tickets and march straight to this show – If you please.

Translations – Reviews

Standard

Translations

English Touring Theatre

Exeter Northcott 

Wednesday 19th March 2014

Review by Grace Natusch

Before I saw translations I was sceptical; how on earth can a play about translating signposts be even remotely compelling? However I was forced to eat my words: A clash of cultures which tears at your heartstrings is what made this play one of the best I’ve seen.

The play is set in a traditional Irish ‘hedge school’ – a rural school for local peasants where they learn a number of subjects, including Greek and Latin, which is quoted extensively during the play. When the brother of one of the teachers returns to help the English army translate place names for Gaelic to English, suddenly people are forced to make decisions between the new culture being thrust upon them and the old traditions they are used to. This is further complicated when Maire, one of the students at the school falls in love with Yolland, one of the English soldiers.

Translations centres around the limitations of language: Sarah cannot speak properly and is alienated from the other characters, English cannot communicate the meaning of Gaelic place names properly and Greek and Latin cannot prepare Maire for a life in America, darkly foreshadowing the fading of Gaelic into a dead language; in a stroke of genius, the entire dialogue of the play is also shown on translation screens. Underneath it all you get the sense of the tensions bubbling between the invading English culture and the oppressed Irish culture, with Maire and Yolland caught up in between. While Maire and Yolland are both fascinated by each other’s cultures and eager to explore them, there is a warning in the play about the dangers of ‘marrying outside the tribe’.

This had me thinking a lot about the idea of cultural assimilation and how relevant the themes in the play continue to be. While colonial oppression is less of an issue than it used to be, it is often complained that western civilisation presses its values and ideals on other cultures. The play explores this idea through the translation of signs, literally demanding assimilation through the use of language, effectively ‘anglicising’ Ireland.

Brian Friel Season Company

Review by Carmen Paddock

Brian Friel’s 1980 play Translations, set in 1833 Ireland when the English were dividing and renaming local regions and towns, was written at the height of the Troubles but loses none of its poignancy in 2014. Its themes of clashing communication underscoring deeper sociopolitical clashes were resoundingly melancholy and seemed to hit a more universal connection than the topical circumstances of its origins suggest. Friel’s plot and cleverly-written script juxtapose a hedge school’s instruction in Latin and ancient Greek (two dead languages) with the students’ lack of knowledge of English (the invading language), making this tragedy of lost culture relatable even to those with no personal connection to Ireland’s situation.

Perhaps the aesthetic of this English Touring Theatre production, seen on 19th March at the Exeter Northcott Theatre, helped to create this pervasive feeling of loss. It established the play’s atmospheric setting from the very start; upon entering the auditorium, the audience was greeted by a dimly-lit snapshot of another time – a two-storey stone farmhouse and barn surrounded by straw-strewn grounds – already visible on stage. Throughout the play this set was never cleared away; lighting changes indicated each act’s beginning and ending as well as changes of scene within the play, and neither curtains nor set changes were ever used. This use of lighting proved to be a wise design decision, not only allowing for the construction of this incredibly realistic scene but also keeping the audience immersed in the world of the play, a world which we saw before its inevitable invasion and destruction.

The plot follows the inhabitants of Baile Beag, a fictional village in Donegal. The old schoolmaster Hugh leads a hedge school with the locals, including his son Manus, a half-mute girl named Sarah (a further addition to the communication theme), and Maire, a young lady planning to emigrate to America. After the arrival of the English army, who have come to survey and divide the land and to Anglicise and standardise all local names, a love triangle ensues between Manus, Maire, and Lieutenant Yolland, who subsequently goes missing. Amid murmurs of violence the commanding captain orders the destruction of the village’s livelihoods should Yolland not be found, and the play ends ambiguously yet not hopefully.

The actors all created strong, individual characters; the standouts were Beth Cooke, who brought a poignant mix of idealism and realism to Maire, and James Northcote, a lovably yet foolishly optimistic Yolland. The one weak link may have been Niall Buggy as Hugh, who veered towards stereotype in his portrayal of the esoteric schoolmaster and thus lost some sympathy in his conduct towards the English officers.

As previously mentioned, the interplay of languages features prominently; however no Irish was actually spoken, instead being delivered in English with heavy Irish accents. It took a while to figure out this conceit but once apparent it served the script’s nuances well, especially when two characters would speak the same lines – word for word – and have no idea what the other was saying. Latin and Greek are heard and not always translated in the text. To facilitate understanding, electronic subtitle boards were placed on either side of the stage. Everything was subtitled, even the straight English text, which made sense for coherence and continuity but could be distracting, tempting one to look at the screens instead of the action.

On the whole, this production of Translations was an achingly beautiful examination of cultures lost, communications severed, and the memories of times past.

Birdsong – review

Standard

Birdsong

PREVIEW: Birdsong

The Birmingham REP

22nd March 2014. Matinee Performance

Bethany StuartReview by guest critic Bethany Stuart, Arts Editor Exposé

Based on the bestselling novel by Sebastian Faulkes, Birdsong provides a deeply moving exploration of the psychological and anthropological effects of World War One. Haunted by his tempestuous relationship with Isobel, our protagonist – Stephen – is constantly battling with his past, his morals and his attempt to understand what he is fighting for.

The staging of this play obviously had its limitations, and though initially the claustrophobic set and shifting timeframes seemed incomprehensibly erratic, once Stephen’s character developed a relationship with the audience one could more easily align the transience of the scenes with a documentation of his downward-spiralling mental well-being.

The relationship between the characters was intensely presented, scenes often taking the form of dialogues or monologues and this notion of reattaching value to individuals was present throughout: rather than soldiers the audience met brothers, fathers, sons and friends. Towards the end there was a particularly humanising scene which mirrored the British and German soldiers, showing how underneath the propaganda of war they were essentially all young men just striving to stay alive and fighting for their loved ones.

Overall it was greatly thought-provoking and, although there was a notable absence of the epic battle scenes which fill the other forms of Birdsong, as a piece of theatre it offered a spotlight on the more intimate matters of war and gave a platform for the thorough examination of the individual in a time where identity was formed by which side of the trench you were fighting from.

Birdsong comes to Exeter Northcott 6th-10th May 2014

Above Bored – Review

Standard

Image

Owdyado Theatre Above Bored 

10th March 2014

The Bikeshed Theatre

Review by Phoebe Graham

Jenny Davison and Jean Taylor are two diligent employees, content with their steady jobs at Evabond Glue Company, or at least they appear to be. However, amidst an intense interrogation after the brutal murder of their boss, the glued-up cracks of their true dissatisfaction split and they are both pushed to the edge of insanity, with a sticky twist or two to help them along the way.  

Owdyado Theatre’s two-man production is a heavily character driven piece with an often sharp and vibrant script sprinkled with allusions of Pinter to support the psychodrama. This is strongly enhanced by a very frank set design of a sickeningly ordinary office but infiltrated with an interrogation lamp and padded cell-like walls, interlinking the two approaches to the show seamlessly. The scenes were imaginatively marked by satirical video adverts for the company which provided a consistently engaging comic relief throughout the production that never failed to produce a hearty laugh. The story itself provides an intelligent insight into the breaking point of human disillusionment and not only shatters the fragile façade of the central characters, but also cleverly shatters the audience’s own preconceived illusions of the production (but no spoilers allowed!)  

The two actors play both their employee characters and multirole as their corresponding interrogators, often having to switch between the two on stage which adds another dimension to the show’s increasingly chaotic play-out. Charlotte Bister wonderfully executes this differentiation between the nervous Jenny and the stern and sexy interviewer. Daniel Richards also gives a high-energy and engaging performance of stressed-out business man Jean but I found that the nature of both of his characters weren’t distinct enough to arouse the same effect as Bister; if a more dynamic character was formed for Richards’ interrogator then this would heighten the farce that I desperately wanted more of. The narrative naturally soared through many witty heights but sometimes a forceful consciousness was exposed in its flight to try to produce its almost non-naturalistic style. I think the definition of the play could be made sharper and more effortless if they made more of their comic touches and perhaps reigned in on the effort to shock the audience with irrational, psychotic climaxes as the script already contains the dark subtleties that move the audience to a pleasurable discomfort. All this show needs is a bit of its own glue to tighten the production so that the characters and script can complement each other to its utmost ability, supported by its already polished style.

Above Bored, even only after its sixth public performance, is a highly creative and original piece that holds sensational potential and I look forward to seeing this deserving production and talented company develop and grow in the future.

Jenny and co-artistic director: Charlotte Bister

Jean and co-artistic director: Daniel Richards

Director: Simon Harvey

Twitter: @OwdyadoTheatre

The Young Critics Meet… Belinda Dillon

Standard

The Role of a Critic

Blogpost by Phoebe Graham 

Phoebe GrahamSupplied with Jaffa cakes and cookies as fuel for thinking, we began our first mentoring session at Exeter Northcott Theatre!

Myself, along with Freddie, Saxon and Jack, met with Belinda Dillon (Editor and Theatre Critic), Jenny Hogg (Media Officer at Exeter Northcott) and Polly Agg-Manning (Engage Producer at Exeter Northcott) and of course Lizzy, our wonderful YC’s Tutor, to discuss the role of a critic in the theatre and the implications that arise from, not only reviewing a show itself, but reviewing a performance on a local level.

We started by introducing ourselves and expressing our current experiences as a Youth Critic which for me has been an exciting opportunity to be able to develop my cultural awareness, writing skills and it gives me an excuse to frequently enjoy one of my favourite things: going to the theatre! It was fascinating to hear about Belinda’s career as a theatre critic who currently writes for Exeunt Magazine as well as running her own schemes such as the Wildfire critic’s magazine for Devon’s Ignite Theatre Festival.

The reality of writing

After hearing about her wealth of experience, she reassured us that “good writing is always hard, I’ve been doing it 20 years – it’s still hard.” We found this to be a profound notion in the process of writing; it really doesn’t get easier the more you do it. Organic thoughts don’t become easier to express on paper and I don’t think they should. In terms of writing a review, different shows mean different things to you and will explore different themes using a variety of different methods which will require you to approach each review in a different way…see where I’m going with this? Every review, despite its common name, is a separate and different creation and I suppose if it became easier then the quality of these creations would dwindle as well as the time and effort being put into the reviews. So although we may all find it frustrating at times when you’re sat with a blank page in front of you, struggling to deliver golden nuggets of criticism, remember and accept that it’s probably always going to be this way, even for industry professionals, but it’s all worth it in the end when you finish (or print off, depending on how technologically advanced you are) your personal and satisfying contribution to both yourself, your play and the creative culture.

Who do we write a review for?

This brings me onto the next provocation of our discussion, who do we actually write a review for? We gave a range of answers which included ourselves, the actors, the audience and potential audience members…basically everyone involved in the performance process. Although this is a subjective matter, I believe this to be true, a review is surely written for the purpose of being read by anyone with a vested interest in that play; it can serve as a judgement as to whether to see a production, a useful critique for the performers in the play or even those who just want to hear a second opinion of something they have watched. However, above all, I think a review is written in order to express your own views as a creative outlet which I think is essential for the development of our critical senses, not just in terms of the theatre but also our every day critical awareness. I think that by being able to express our views, especially in a public forum like this blog, we are able to help each other to progress as writers and help the concept of the theatre to develop as well because after all, what is the point in presenting a piece of theatre that isn’t going to evoke a reaction?

How to go about writing a review

Belinda then gave us a number of useful tips on how to go about writing an effective review. We agreed that we didn’t see much of an appeal to writing notes during a show, not only could it disrupt your own experience of a show but also the actors’ too. She suggested that it is better to take immediate notes after the show has ended or have a discussion with someone you have taken with you and write the review itself the morning after which allows you to dwell on your thoughts for a little time before having to order them into a (hopefully) eloquent fashion. We noted how often having that small company with you when watching a show could be very valuable to a review as collectively you can think intricately about the show and pick up on things the other has missed. I feel the act of writing a review is a definite process that really should take a comfortable amount of time to create in order to do both yourself, and the performance, justice albeit in times so heavily reliant on the immediacy of the media, time is often not a given luxury.

Here is a handy list of the other tips Belinda gave us when approaching a review:

Do a first draft, then don’t be afraid to refine, restructure it, tighten it up

The first few lines of a review are crucial, avoid preamble.

Be careful of spoilers, if you need to talk about a twist and will give it away, state this at the beginning of the review Warning: This contains spoilers.

Use active verbs, rather than passive.

Don’t generalise

Don’t say we/the audience – you don’t really know what everyone else thought – say I!

Reviewing in the local area

We then focused in on our own role as young critics in and around the Exeter area and discussed how easy it was to write in such an intimate region where often theatre companies are smaller and therefore the exposure we provide is bigger for them than that of an already nationally acclaimed production. I know out of personal experience that I have often written with a naturally soft touch when reviewing a show because I know that all the company want is some positive publicising so they can continue (as many rely on arts funding like IdeasTap) what they clearly love to do, and I’m not one to put down the arts! However, we agreed that it is important to be honest about a piece for both yourself and the performers but this can be done in a diplomatic and constructive manner by pointing out what you thought was good but also what didn’t quite work for you. This brought up the issue that sometimes you can watch a show and dislike it but only because it was a question of taste rather than quality. In this case, it is important to display that it wasn’t what you’re personally ‘in to’ but you can still appreciate its merit as a performance.  In light of the meeting, I want to be more honest (rather than ruthless) when writing a review and not shy away from the flaws of a show, finding an effective balance of sincerity in my writing.

Young Critics – does age matter?

A point that really stuck with me from our first meeting was the credibility of a Youth Critic compared to that of a professional. For me, a reviewer can be anybody and you’ll find that this is true, as the good old cliché says ‘everyone’s a critic’ – and they really are. Everyone has opinions, the  only difference is some take the time to put their opinions on paper and others are lucky enough to have those views published and read on a large scale, but really the intent is the same. I think to be able to be young and have the opportunity to critique on a local scale could potentially be hugely beneficial to the youth arts in the area, something that is currently oppressed, particularly in our education system, but should be encouraged if we want a well rounded society.

Belinda recommends reading other critics work.  Here are some recommendations of bloggers to get you started: 

Catherine Love: http://catherinelove.co.uk 
A Younger Theatre: http://www.ayoungertheatre.com
Theatre Bristol Writers in Residence: http://www.theatrebristolwriters.net

Reflections from Freddie House

Freddie HouseBefore an intimate question and answer session with Belinda Dillon, I had an idea of how to approach writing a decent review. However, after getting the opportunity to converse with such an experienced writer, I am now inclined to adapt a more creative approach to my writing, eliminating a linear format I have become accustomed to. Another stimulating idea that I picked up on was letting the themes and techniques used in a piece of theatre influence the form and style of a response. Belinda also mentioned that she often writes to develop her response,whilst taking time to structure her response in a way that flows well, not necessarily in chronological order.

Reflections thoughts from Belinda Dillion

Image As I’ve seen two or three shows recently that I really didn’t enjoy, I’ve been having some more thoughts about how we can be ‘responsible’ as critics. I know it’s often easier (and more fun, if I’m honest) to write an out-an-out scathing review of a show that we don’t like, but I think we need to always have an eye on the impact of our words; after all, we have a platform to pass judgment on other people’s work, and we need to be mindful of that. I’m not saying we shouldn’t be honest – because an honest, open dialogue with fair criticism is what encourages us all to get better at what we do – but that we should be rigorous in our approach. If you think a show is ‘bad’, qualify your statements. Describe the aspects that don’t work for you, and explain why. It’s always tricky – and all art is subjective, after all – but if you can back up your statements with considered qualification, then you’re on the right track.

A big thank you to Belinda and the team for a brilliant meeting (and for some brilliant biscuits!)